Yesterday (14 April) and today mark the 150th anniversary of the assassination of President Lincoln by John Wilkes Booth. Here is an interesting illustration, showing Columbia (??) mourning over the President's casket, and in the upper corners, a soldier grieving, representing the sorrow of the Army (on the upper left), and a sailor sobbing into his hands next to his gun, representing the sorrow of the Navy (upper right) for their commander-in-chief.
Showing posts with label abraham lincoln. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abraham lincoln. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
Monday, February 18, 2013
Presidents' Day: Lincoln Remembered
![]() |
| Abraham Lincoln, The Martyr, Victorious by John Sartain |
I found them. The quotes were great. It was shaping up to be a great blog post. When I got to the blogger document to compose, I froze. Something wasn't sitting. The problem was, most of the quotes I sifted through were all too familiar. Either paired in small sections on the navies or wordy introductions, the stories seem to overlap over time.
His close relationship with his naval officers. The setup of the Atlantic blockade. Several award-winning books are published on Lincoln's relationship with the Navy. How many times can we include his speech about "Uncle Sam's web-feet" without it becoming dry and overused?
Unsatisfied, I stared at a blank blog page for twenty minutes. The writing cursor blinked on the screen, laughing at me. Frustrated (and admittedly waking up), I resorted to scour the Internet to see anything newly published. After an unsuccessful search on some scholarly websites, I throttled back and searched the web to see what the general public had to say. One of the top hits about Lincoln and the U.S. Navy (after sifting through Wikipedia and the usual .org's) was a simple question from an answer-based website:
I wasn't alarmed by this. After all, it's a question often asked. I thought of the first time I stared at a blank screen. It was December 29, 2009 - the first blog post ever written for the Civil War Navy Sesquicentennial.
Staring at that screen over three years ago, I asked the same question: Why did Lincoln use the Navy? Why is this important to the narrative of sesquicentennial remembrance? Today above all others, why does Lincoln's memory hold more permanence than ever? They say the easiest questions asked are the hardest to answer. Perhaps there is some truth in that.
Today, we honor the men who stood resolute to foreign powers abroad and political and social change at home. It is too easy for us to look back and judge these men by their actions. Lincoln is not around today to tell us his introspective thoughts on the U.S. Navy, or the trials and tribulations faced by so many who gave all so some could go free. Unfortunately, some of these stock quotes are all we have.
Today is the perfect day to reflect not on what Lincoln said, but what he did instead. His words would be meaningless today if there was not decisive action backed behind them. Not everyone agrees which presidents did their job to their best ability. What we all can agree on is the impact Lincoln had for the United States and the advancement of today's greatest Navy.
Full speed ahead,
Matthew T. Eng
Monday, January 14, 2013
Gideon Welles' Thoughts on Emancipation
![]() |
| First Reading of the Emancipation Proclamation of Lincoln, by Francis Bicknell Carpenter (Welles is seated in the middle next to Abraham Lincoln) |
As many people know, Steven Spielberg’s recently released
Civil War biopic Lincoln tells the
story of the pivotal moments faced by the 16th president during the
drafting and passing of the 13th Amendment. One of the necessary steps to its passing was
the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. Taken in tandem with the 13th
Amendment, the Emancipation Proclamation was arguably the most
political/socially-fueled document in the United States since the Declaration
of Independence. The General Order
announced the Emancipation Proclamation written by Lincoln, which was signed on
1 January 1863.
Part of the film’s appeal was its close ties to the wildly
popular book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, Team
of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. In large part, the film is an adaptation of
her work. In the film, actor Grainger
Hines portrays Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles. Although Welles played a small role in the
film, in reality Welles had many interesting observations about the abolition
of slavery from the Emancipation Proclamation through the passing of the 13th
Amendment. The Emancipation Proclamation
made the abolishment of slavery a joint political/military goal, one that
Welles could no longer ignore.
The following are excerpts from the Diary of Gideon Welles
in the months and days before and after the issuance of General Order No.
4. You can see through his diary entries
a reactionary timeline of thought that matches perfectly with the social and
political climate of wartime America.
“Father Neptune” was a concise and calculated thinker, able to weigh the
implications of combat equally with that of political choice or necessity. In many cases, especially in the last quote
included here, Welles was absolutely right in his thoughts on Emancipation and
the slavery question.
You can see the documents association with General Order No.
4 at the Naval History and Heritage Command Facebook Page.
(It is important to note that the Proclamation did not apply
to the five states not in rebellion, as well as regions controlled by the
United States Army. Individual rights
for emancipation would occur on a state-by-state basis with the passing of the
13th Amendment.)
The President
Broaches the Subject of Emancipation to his cabinet (Fall 1862):
“It was a new departure for the President, for until this
time, in all our previous interviews, whenever the question of emancipation or
the mitigation of slavery had been in any way alluded to, he had been prompt
and emphatic in denouncing any interference by the General Government with the
subject. This was, I think the sentiment
of every member of the Cabinet, all of whom, including the President,
considered it a local, domestic question appertaining to the States
respectively, who had never parted with the authority over it.”
Post-Antietam Public
Sentiment (September 24, 1862):
“As I write, 9 P.M., a band of music strikes up on the
opposite side of the square, a complimentary serenade to the President for the
Emancipation Proclamation. The document
has been in the main well received, but there is some violent opposition…”
Emancipation
Proclamation (1 January 1863):
“The Emancipation Proclamation is published in this evening’s
Star. This is a broad step, and will be
a landmark in history. The immediate
effect will not be all its friends anticipate or its opponents apprehend. Passing events are steadily accomplishing
what is here proclaimed.
Final Thoughts Prior to General Order No. 4 (10
January 1863):
“Some things have taken place which will undoubtedly for a
time exasperate the Southern mind, for they will affect Southern society,
habits, labor, and pursuits. For a
period emancipation will aggravate existing differences, and a full generation
will be necessary to effect and complete the change which has been commenced.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



